Concurrent strength and endurance training: the influence of dependent variable selection.

Twenty-six active university students were randomly allocated to resistance (R, n = 9), endurance (E, n = 8), and concurrent resistance and endurance (C, n = 9) training conditions. Training was completed 3 times per week in all conditions, with endurance training preceding resistance training in the C group. Resistance training involved 4 sets of upper- and lower-body exercises with loads of 4-8 repetition maximum (RM). Each endurance training session consisted of five 5-minute bouts of incremental cycle exercise at between 40 and 100% of peak oxygen uptake (.VO2peak). Parameters measured prior to and following training included strength (1RM and isometric and isokinetic [1.04, 3.12, 5.20, and 8.67 rad.s(-1)] strength), .VO2peak and Wingate test performance (peak power output [PPO], average power, and relative power decline). Significant improvements in 1RM strength were observed in the R and C groups following training. .VO2peak significantly increased in E and C but was significantly reduced in R after training. Effect size (ES) transformations on the other dependent variables suggested that performance changes in the C group were not always similar to changes in the R or E groups. These ES data suggest that statistical power and dependent variable selection are significant issues in enhancing our insights into concurrent training. It may be necessary to assess a range of performance parameters to monitor the relative effectiveness of a particular concurrent training regimen.

Characteristics of titin in strength and power athletes.

The purpose of this investigation was to identify characteristics of the muscle protein titin in different athletic populations with increased levels of strength and power relative to non-athletes. Subjects fell into one of four groups: (1) non-athletes (NA) ( n=5), (2) weightlifters (WL) (n=5), (3) powerlifters (PL) (n=5), (4) sprinters (S) (n=5). A one repetition maximum in the squat exercise was performed to assess strength. In addition, countermovement vertical jump trials were performed to assess power capabilities. Peak power (W(peak)) was calculated for the vertical jumps from force plate measurements. From gel electrophoresis analyses of muscle samples, titin-1 (T1) and titin-2 (T2) protein bands were identified, quantified and expressed relative to each other. In addition the relative mobility (R(f)) of T1 and T2 was determined as an estimate of molecular weight. The NA group [%T1=47.8 (5.1), %T2=52.2 (5.1), mean (SE)] had lower T1 and higher T2 percentages than WL [%T1=62.3 (6.6), %T2=37.7 (6.6)], PL [%T1=66.8 (5.0), %T2=33.2 (5.0)] and S [%T1=65.9 (4.9), %T2=34.1 (4.9)] groups (P< or =0.10, preliminary investigation into titin and exercise justifies more liberal alpha level). No significant differences were found in R(f) of T1 or T2 between the groups. This investigation has shown that there is a differential expression of titin protein bands in competitive athletes with increased levels of strength and power in comparison to untrained non-athletic individuals. Some relationships between titin characteristics and athletic performance were observed; however, no conclusions can be made based on these data as to the contribution of titin to strength or power capabilities.